Indonesia

Chris Naziris of MKK Law Indonesia examines Public Private Partnerships as an alternative means by which development of infrastructure can be managed and promoted. Recent changes to the legislation in Indonesia include financial incentives designed to boost participation in the scheme.


The Regulation of Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) for Infrastructure Projects in Indonesia is governed by Presidential Regulation No.67 of 2005 (PR 67/2005). This law has been amended twice, most recently on September 9th 2011 with the promulgation of Presidential Regulation (PR 56/2011).

This article provides a summary of the current law in relation to PPP projects in Indonesia and the important changes which make investment in these projects more attractive.

Accelerating infrastructure development
As with PPP legislation in other countries, the purposes of Indonesia’s PPP regulations are to accelerate infrastructure development through improved cooperation between the public and private sectors.

PPP projects covered by the legislation include the traditional areas of infrastructure such as transport and power generation and the arrangement between the parties is by either a cooperation agreement or operational license. Following public consultation, a Project Priority List is published which sets out projects that conform to national or regional development and/or infrastructure plans.

The bankability of the project
The most recent amendment to the law in this area PR 56/2011 takes into account the recent implementation of the Indonesian Infrastructure Guarantee Fund (IIGF). The IIGF was established in 2010 to provide a guarantee for infrastructure projects and to improve the “bankability” of infrastructure projects in Indonesia. Article 9(3) adds that projects on the Project Priority List, if required, will obtain “in principle” support from the Minister/Head of Institution/Head of Region and/or approvals for a guarantee from the IIGF.

Article 10 of PR 56/2011 modifies the earlier law to allow foreign as well as Indonesian entities to apply to initiate new PPP projects if such projects are not included in the sector master plan. The only restrictions are that the projects must be technically integrated with the sector, financially feasible and not require Government support in the form of financial fiscal contributions. As was provided in the earlier amendment, if the new PPP project is approved and finally tendered, the initiating entity will be given compensation in the form of additional points, a right to match the best bidder, or the purchase of the project initiative – including the intellectual Property rights incorporated therein – by the Public Sector or by the winning bidder.

Article 13 (4A) of PR 56/2011 now clarifies that if the initiating entity is compensated with additional points or the right to match in the tender, all feasibility study and other supporting documents relating to the project will immediately and at no cost be transferred to the pertinent Public Sector.

Successful Project Sponsors of PPP Projects will be determined by public tender. Under Article 21A, should a foreign entity be awarded a tender, it is now required to form an Indonesian legal entity that will act as the contracting party in the Cooperation Agreement with the Public Sector partner.

Fiscal contributions
Of interest to potential Project Sponsors is the possibility of the Minister of Finance approving Government support in the form of fiscal contributions as well as tax incentives in relation to PPP projects under Article 17A (4). Under the previous regulations, Government support extended only as far as tax incentives. The Government support in the form of fiscal contributions must be expressed in the request for proposal, and previously set forth in the State or Regional Budget, when the project is publicly tendered.

chris.naziris@mkklaw.net
www.mkklaw.net

To read the ASIAN-MENA COUNSEL article Click Here

(Note, if you are using an iPhone or iPad you can also download this article directly to your iBooks after it opens in Google Docs).

IN-HOUSE OPINION: If you are an in-house counsel and you have a comment or an opinion you’d like to share either on this article or its subject matter, contact us at: inhouse@inhousecommunity.com with the article title in the subject line, stating clearly if you wish your comments to remain ‘Private’ or ‘Anonymous’.

Latest Updates
IHC Magazine: Dec 2024 issue with Counsel of the Year Awards 2024 and focus on Dispute Resolution
In this issue, we celebrate the IHC Counsel of the Year Awards, featuring insights from winning teams, delve into the future of dispute resolution with insights from in-house counsel, and sit down with Ben Bury, General Counsel of Gammon Construction, ...
Related Articles
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
Trends in mergers and acquisitions in Indonesia
The government has recently promulgated several regulations that are beneficial for M&A transactions ...
Consolidating Indonesia’s SOEs — risk or reward?
State-owned enterprises (SOEs) are key business players in Indonesia’s economy ...
Latest Articles
IHC Magazine: Dec 2024 issue with Counsel of the Year Awards 2024 and focus on Dispute Resolution
In this issue, we celebrate the IHC Counsel of the Year Awards, featuring insights from winning teams, delve into the future of dispute resolution with insights from in-house counsel, and sit down with Ben Bury, General Counsel of Gammon Construction, ...