India

On August 11, 2015 the division bench of the Supreme Court of India overturned a full bench decision of the Gujarat High Court in the matter of Coastal Gujarat Power Limited v. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority. The judgment of the Supreme Court has far-reaching consequences, a brief analysis of which is set out herein.

Facts: Coastal Gujarat Power Limited (CGPL) availed financial assistance from 13 lenders for setting up a power project. The lenders formed a consortium as a trust and executed a security trustee agreement inter se appointing the State Bank of India (SBI) as the security trustee. CGPL executed an indenture of mortgage (Deed) with the SBI, thereby mortgaging its assets and the Deed was thereafter registered with the sub-registrar Mundra, with a total stamp duty of Rs.4,21,000/-. The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority (CCRA) assessed the stamp duty liability on the Deed and raised an additional demand of Rs.50,41,000/- on CGPL. CGPL challenged the additional demand and made an application before the Gujarat High Court under Section 54(1A) of the Gujarat Stamp Act, 1958 (Act). The Gujarat High Court ruled in favour of CGPL and held that the state of Gujarat is not entitled to recover any additional stamp duty. CCRA moved the Supreme Court against the decision of the Gujarat High Court, which overturned the decision of the Gujarat High Court.

CGPL arguments before the Gujarat High Court: Under law, stamp duty is leviable on an ‘instrument’ (and not on a transaction) and accordingly, in the instant case, proper stamp duty was paid on the Deed and the security trustee agreement by CGPL.

It was also contended that taking aid of Section 51 of the Act cannot be construed to empower the state to levy duty on the transaction de hors the instrument. Additionally, the security trustee agreement is recognised and controlled by the provisions of the Indian Trusts Act and thus, the security trustee holds the mortgage for and on behalf of 13 lenders and such fact in itself does not fictionally create separate/distinct matters/transactions involving 13 lenders.

It is also a well-settled principle that while interpreting a taxing statute capable of more than one interpretation, the interpretation in favour of the subject has to be found favour with as against the one favouring the revenue authority.

CCRA arguments before the Gujarat High Court: Section 5 applies only when the instrument comprises of more than one transaction and it is immaterial whether those transactions are of the same category or of different categories.

The principle that fiscal statute should be strictly construed does not rule out the application of the principle of reasonable construction.

CCRA arguments before the Supreme Court: The Deed was executed as one instrument instead of several distinct instruments with the sole purpose of evading stamp duty. The instrument in question relates to several distinct matters or distinct transactions inasmuch as CGPL availed distinct loan from 13 different lenders, hence, the instrument falls under Section 5 of the Act.

CGPL arguments before the Supreme Court: As no independent right was created in favour of the lenders under the Deed, it cannot be held to be a separate and distinct transaction. Assuming that the 13 lenders were seen to have an individual interest, there was in fact a commonality of such interest with all the other secured lenders and, therefore, the instrument did not deal with distinct matters.

Even if a doubt arises with regard to the interpretation of the Deed and as to whether it comprises distinct matters or not, the benefit of such doubt must be given to the assessee.

Supreme Court ruling: On proper construction of the Deed, it can be regarded as 13 distinct transactions, therefore the impugned order is set aside. CGPL is liable to pay deficit stamp duty together with interest.

Comments: In consortium arrangement, it is general practice that the security interest is created in favour of a security trustee who holds the security in trust for the benefit of all the lenders and acts as per their instructions. Creation of security interest in favour of a single entity has multiple benefits such as: ease of assignment; being cost effective; and ease of enforcement. The ruling not only affects the consortium arrangement, but has the potential to thwart the structuring of debt issue, wherein there are multiple subscribers and a debenture trustee is appointed to protect their interest.

––––––
Endnote
1. Any instrument comprising or relating to several distinct matters or distinct transactions shall be chargeable with the aggregate amount of the duties with which separate instruments, each comprising or relating to one of such matters or distinct transactions would be chargeable under this Act.

Clasis Law
14th Floor, Dr Gopal Das Bhawan,
28, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi 110 001, India
Tel: (91) 11 4213 0000 / Fax: (91) 11 4213 0099
Email: vineet.aneja@clasislaw.com
pratyush.khurana@clasislaw.com
Website: www.clasislaw.com

Related Articles by Firm
Radical changes in the Foreign Direct Investment regime
INDIA- It is observed that India has the potential to attract even more foreign investment which could be achieved by liberalising ...
Mare Maritime Singapore Pte Ltd Vs. M.T. Everrich 8 [Notice of Motion (L) No. 2418 of 2015 in Admiralty Suit No. 854 of 2015]
Background: The owners of EVERRICH 8 (the Vessel), through their subsidiary Yuanland Ltd, entered into voyage charterparty with Rakha Al Khaleej International LLC ...
India's The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015 makes major changes to the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996
The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance 2015 gives the necessary impetus for ease of conducting arbitration in India and enables speedy settlement of commercial disputes.
Indian patent office revokes Hoffman-La Roche’s ‘Valganciclovir’ patent
The Controller of Patents (India) recently revoked the patent granted for the anti-retroviral drug ‘Valganciclovir’ used for treating active cytomegalovirus retinitis infection (CMV) ...
Urban reforms – three urban rejuvenation schemes launched
There is a compelling need to develop sustainable and technology-driven urban centres, partly as the burgeoning urban population is creating pressure on existing cities and partly to address the growing ...
Highlights of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015
The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015 (Amendment Act), which aims to amend the rigidities of the Companies Act, 2013 (Act), has ...
India - Projects, energy and infrastructure update
Including: Long-term infrastructure bonds;Smart cities mission and urban rejuvenation scheme; Railways to e-auction re-development of stations; New hybrid annuity model of PPP for the road sector; Shell set for global acquisition of BG; and IFC signs master co-operation agreement ...
The New Land Bill – ground reality
The Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015 (2015 Bill) was …
Prima Facie Validity of a registered trade mark in India – A strong but rebuttable presumption
The Indian trademarks law recognises both statutory as well as common law remedy to protect the rights of the proprietor of a trade mark. However, it is well-known that …
Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill passed as ordinance in India
The long-awaited Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill (the Bill) has become a provisional law in India. The Bill, which could not be passed in Parliament in its winter session, was promulgated by the President …
Need for uniform stamp duty incidence across all States of India
‘Stamp Duty’ is a tax levied on an instrument by which any right or liability is, or purports to be created, transferred, limited, extended, extinguished or recorded …
‘Make in India’ campaign: Opportunities for investors
With a vision of leading the economy towards a path of high sustainable growth, the Prime Minister of India on September 25th, 2014 launched the ‘Make in India’ campaign. Through the …
Bumpy road ahead for vehicle manufacturers in India – pulled up by the competition watchdog
South Asian markets are one of the fastest growing markets for vehicle manufacturers worldwide. However, doing business in South Asia has its own challenges. The anti-monopoly watchdog of India …
Introduction of real estate investment trusts in India
The Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) in India have been in the news for some time. The World Bank1 describes REIT as a security sold to investors for the purpose of investing in real estate. REITs …
SC Larger Bench decision in case of Kone Elevators – distinction between ‘contracts of sale’ vis-a-vis ‘works contract’
The Constitutional Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court (SC), over-ruling the earlier decision of three-member Bench re State of A.P. v. Kone Elevators (India) Ltd1, has held that the activity of manufacturing, …
Companies Act, 2013 – implications for investors
One of the recent initiatives of the Indian Government towards ensuring sustainable economic growth and improving investment climate is enactment …
India Update, inc. Medical device controls
An overview of how and where regulatory controls apply to medical devices in India. Plus: key judgements passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court; changes in corporate and commercial matters; and case laws in indirect taxation.
Related Articles
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
Brands – Role and liability of celebrity endorsers
The marketing and advertising industry has grown as an organised industry using innovative ideas that are designed to ...
India: Corporate and commercial update
Including: The Constitution (One Hundred And First Amendment) Act; The Foreign Direct Investment Policy; and The Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Fourth Amendment Rules ...
Latest Articles