South Korea
Tags: International Trade The Act Providing Major Amendments to the Trademark Law (the Act) was passed by the National Assembly on February 4, 2016. The Act takes effect on September 1, 2016. This Act is significant because it is the first major revision to the law since 1990. The Act was passed to harmonise Korean trademark law with the international trademark system and to improve Korean citizens’ understanding of trademark laws.Primarily the Act focusses on simplifying the trademark filing process and making Korean trademark laws more like those found in the international community. It attempts to accomplish this by: concisely redefining essential trademark law terms in accordance with international trends; expanding who may request revocation of an unused trademark; and changing the filing standards for establishing a trademark right to enhance convenience.Currently, essential trademark law terms in Korea are vaguely defined and not well understood by ordinary citizens. To alleviate this problem the Act redefines these terms with specific examples so that Korean citizens can easily grasp the key concepts of trademark law. This method of specifically defining key terms of trademark law, such as distinctiveness and source marking, has been widely used in the United States and Europe. Furthermore, it provides greater latitude for a mark to be qualified as a trademark by relaxing the standard. Under the Act, a mark may be qualified as a trademark so long as the mark effectively performs a trademark’s original function as a source indicator. Accordingly, in Korea a trademark will now be defined as a mark used to distinguish one’s products or services from another’s, and a mark will be defined as any token used to represent a product’s source, regardless of its composition or manner of expression. The Act also expands who may request that a trademark be revoked. Currently revocation may be claimed only by “an interested party”. Under the new law “anyone” can request a revocation trial. The purpose of this change is to increase the availability of active trademarks by eliminating unused trademarks, and to avoid delays in trademark revocation trials caused by disputes over whether the party seeking the revocation has a proper “interest” to request the revocation. Additionally, when the final judgment is made, the Act allows an unused trademark to be revoked retroactively to the filing date of a revocation trial request. These changes increase the number of available trademarks and expand trademark choices. Currently in Europe and Japan, anyone is permitted to request revocation of a trademark. Moreover, nominal use by the trademark holder is not sufficient to prove active usage. The Act follows these international trends. When the Act takes effect, the trademark revocation process for unused trademarks will be simplified and it will benefit individuals and corporations that wish to use these dormant trademarks. The Act also eliminates the one-year waiting period requirement after lapse of a pre-existing equivalent or similar trademark. It will allow a new mark to be registered as a trademark as soon as a pre-registered equivalent or similar mark lapses and loses its force as a trademark. That is a departure from the existing law which prohibited the registration of a new mark for one year in Korea if a pre-registered equivalent or similar mark had existed, even if it had lapsed. This modification will enable a trademark right to be swiftly established, saving time and expense in the filing process. Finally, the Act promotes greater transparency and knowledge about trademark registration status by requiring trademark registrations to be announced in the Trademark Gazette. Furthermore, by permitting a trademark examiner to correct trivial mistakes in registration documents on his/her own authority, and by extending the grace period for supplying missing registration materials from 14 days to two months, the Act makes the registration process more convenient for trademark applicants. These are welcome changes under the Act. They are expected to produce positive results that will significantly enhance the trademark filing process in Korea, for the benefit of both domestic and overseas corporations doing business in Korea. This is good news for the business community in Korea. –––––––––––––––– |
Related Articles by Firm
The controversy over “different franchise fees” in Korea
In Korea, many franchisors require their franchisees to purchase franchise products from the franchisors. They do this to ensure a level of uniformity in the franchise business, enabling franchise customers to receive the same types and quality of goods from ...
Notes to foreign financial investment corporations that are starting businesses in South Korea
As of September 2019, there were 47,799 foreign investors registered with the Korea Financial Supervisory Service, including 36,190 institutional investors ...
Amended Patent Act to increase value of Korean IP
The Act has recently been amended primarily to introduce punitive damages and relieve patentees of some responsibility to prove acts of infringement.
New Changes in Korean Labour Law
Many foreign employers find Korean labour law to be a challenging obstacle to running a business in Korea, due to its complexity and the intensity of the regulations ...
In Korea, a licensee is now considered an interested party who may invalidate a patent
On February 21, 2019, the Korea Supreme Court issued a decision making it clear that a licensee is an interested party who may file a petition to invalidate a patent for which he holds a licence ...
The value of a citizen’s participation trial
Since February 2008, pursuant to the Act on Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials, defendants in many types of criminal cases in Korea have had the right to a “citizen’s participation” trial, where a group of five to nine jurors acts ...
Korea promotes a new regulatory “sandbox” system to fuel innovation
Domestic Korean business organisations and foreign chambers of commerce have repeatedly complained about the highly regulated business environment in Korea ...
Patent licensees may file a petition for trial to seek invalidation of the licensed patent
The Korea Supreme Court ruled on February 21, 2019 that a licensee who is granted the right to practise a patent is an interested party who may file a petition for a trial seeking invalidation of the same patent ...
Tax liabilities in Korea for income generated from patents
Recently, the Supreme Court of Korea upheld a lower court judgment finding that under the Korea-US Income Tax Convention, where a foreign corporation has given a patent licence to a company in Korea ...
Preventing allegations of breach of trust for management decisions in Korea
“Is there any chance that I will be accused of breach of trust if I proceed with this transaction?” ...
Major amendments to the Product Liability Act
Since its introduction on July 1, 2002, the Product Liability Act has been enforced for the purpose of holding manufacturers, etc, liable for any damages caused to life, body or property resulting from defects of their products, according to the principle of ...
The Gig Economy: A challenge to conventional labour law
Both employers and workers should pay attention to the issues ...
Major amendments to the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secrets Protection Act
Following its amendment on April 17, 2018, the new provisions of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secrets Protection Act took effect on July 18, 2018 ...
Amended Law on designation of Chief Information Security Officer by information and communications services providers
The amendment focuses on improving the safety of information and communications networks and protecting personal information.
“Fat finger” mistakes in the Korean stock market
Attention is being focused on typos made in transactions in the Korean stock market.
Brand protection strategies for Korea
Nicholas Park, senior foreign attorney at Lee International IP & Law Group chaired a timely discussion with some of our Seoul in-house thought leaders ...
Ordinary wages in Korea
Calculation of ordinary wages in Korea can have a profound impact on an employer’s labour costs, as ordinary wages are used to calculate other benefits and compensation, including overtime, compensation for unused annual paid leave and severance pay.
Recent amendments to employment and labour laws in Korea
Amendments to several Korean employment and labour statutes were passed on November 28, 2017 and will take effect during the first half of 2018 ...
South Korea: Amendment of the Fair Trade Act
A proposed amendment of the Enforcement Decree of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act (Fair Trade Act) was approved by the State Council on September 26, 2017 ...
South Korea: Big data ownership and regulation
On October 16, 2017, the US Supreme Court decided to hear a case in which Microsoft refused to submit requested data to US law enforcement authorities for a criminal investigation ...
South Korea: Compelling foreign-based inventors to provide deposition testimony in the US
As part of the discovery process in US patent litigation, the party accused of patent infringement will seek the deposition testimony of the inventor ...
Are shares donated to a foundation subject to gift tax?
Hwang Pil-sang, the founder of Suwon Kyocharo, a Korean daily newspaper, decided to donate money earned through his newspaper business to help students of the university he attended ...
Constitutional Court’s decision on Specific Crimes Act changes sentencing expectations
Sparked by an increase in the number of repeat offenders committing crimes, Korea has enacted a number of laws designed to prevent crimes by imposing aggravated punishment on repeat offenders...
Revised Korean law to protect privacy in smartphone apps
On March 22, 2016, Korea took steps to strengthen the protection of personal information in smartphone applications through a partial revision of the Korean Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilisation and Information Protection, etc.
Unfair competition in Korea
The Korean government has taken steps to protect trade secrets more effectively by easing the requirements for trade information to become trade secrets and by enabling ...
Hanjin Shipping’s bankruptcy: is it sailing toward liquidation?
On August 31, 2016, Korea’s largest shipping company and the seventh-largest shipping line in the world, Hanjin Shipping, filed a rehabilitation (bankruptcy) action in Korea. That filing reverberated around the globe...
Comparing liquidated damages and punitive penalties in Korea
Parties to contracts in Korea generally use two types of damages/penalty clauses to prevent breaches of contract: liquidated damages and punitive penalties. ...
The Enforcement Decree of the Act on Fair Agency Transactions
On July 26, 2016, the Korean Fair Trade Commission (FTC) made a pre-announcement of proposed legislation known as the ...
Amendment of the Arbitration Act
The amended Arbitration Act was announced on May 29, 2016. It is the first time in 17 years that the Arbitration Act has ....
Companies face restrictions under Graft Act
Following the Constitutional Court’s decision on the Improper Solicitation and Graft Act, known as the Kim Young-ran Act, ...
The right to be forgotten
One of the issues created by the Internet concerns the right to delete what one has posted on the web ...
Special act on revitalising companies to take effect in August 2016
On February 4, 2016, the “Special Act on Revitalising Companies” (the Act) was passed by the National Assembly of Korea as temporary legislation ...
The Korean government announces Guidelines on Fair Employee Evaluations and Rules of Employment to help enforce its labour reforms
On January 22, 2016, the Ministry of Employment and Labour (MOEL) announced Guidelines on Fair Employee Evaluations and Guidelines ...
New amendment to the Korean Commercial Code
On November 15, 2015, an amendment to the Korean Commercial Code (the KCC) was announced. The amendment, which will take effect in February 2016...
Status of Executives under the Labour Standards Act
Many multinational companies doing business in Korea perceive the country’s labour law as strict and heavily favouring workers. The Labour Standards Act of Korea (LSA) nullifies “at-will” employment ...
Why is a global understanding of intellectual property laws important?
Start-ups and small companies attempting to grow their businesses globally are increasingly receiving warning letters ...
Risk of issuing a warning letter to customers of an alleged patent infringer
Issuance of a cease and desist letter is usually recognised as the first step to be taken by a patentee against an alleged infringer in a patent infringement dispute in Korea. A warning letter to an alleged infringer ...
Tightened regulations on multinational intercompany transactions in Korea 2015
Multinational enterprises (MNEs) that operate or contemplate operating multinational businesses in Korea need to be aware of recent changes in the Adjustment of International Taxes Act of Korea ...
Review of the amendments to the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act
Under the previous version of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act (the Act), a commercial tenant could lose the value of its ‘leasehold premium’ (kwon-ri-gum in Korean), which is the monetary ...
Amendment to the use and protection of credit information
The Use and Protection of Credit Information Act (the Act) was recently amended and is scheduled to take effect on September 12, ...
Use of in-kind contributions for new shares subscriptions in Korea
When investing in a company by subscribing to new shares, the investor can pay the subscription price in cash or in kind. Contributions …
Patent Protection vs. Fair Competition
There has been a significant increase in the number of cases related to the issue of whether the exercise of intellectual property rights violated the Fair Trade Act. These cases have …
KFTC amends the review guidelines on unfair exercise of intellectual property rights
On December 17, 2014, the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) amended the review guidelines on unfair exercise of intellectual property rights (Revised Guidelines), effective December 24, 2014. …
The latest win by Lone Star against national tax service
On June 13, 2014, the Seoul Administrative Court ruled in favour of Lone Star Funds and ordered the tax office to refund US$117 million in taxes collected on the sale of a block of shares …
South Korea – success as an FTA hub?
Koreans often think of themselves as the shrimp between whales and, as the Korean proverb has it, when whales fight it is the shrimp whose back is broken. These days, Korea is more of an orca than a shrimp, but ...
Korean court’s position on parallel importing of genuine goods
Parallel importing occurs when a third party imports genuine goods to Korea without the express permission of the sole/exclusive importer of the goods. …
Current trends with Domain Name Disputes
There have been many instances where a company, intending to expand its business into the Internet world, learns that someone already has registered and owns the company’s business name on …
Considerations in Contracting with DAPA
The Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) of South Korea is responsible for handling and overseeing projects related to military supplies and defense industry procurement. …
Foreign investment into casino-resorts in Korea
In recent years, the Korean regulatory environment has become increasingly aimed at attracting foreign investors and developers to invest into Korea and boost Korea’s tourism industry. Currently eight …
Suggestions for improving Korea’s parallel importation system
‘Parallel Importation’ refers to the importation of genuine foreign products (products covered by the trademark of a foreign company with legitimate trademark rights) by third parties, using different distribution …
The FBPA: South Korea’s Act to prevent bribery of foreign officials
Recently, several former executives of a large multinational corporation were hit with the largest civil penalty ever for individuals in a corporate foreign bribery case - each was ordered to pay US$524,000. …
Amendment to the Foreign Investment Promotion Act
The current Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act (MRFTA) of Korea generally prohibits a second-tier company (i.e., a domestic company …
Project Financing Vehicles (PFVs)
The use of Special Purpose Companies (SPCs) has become prevalent in financing large projects that demand substantial amounts of money …
Understanding the ‘5 percent rule’ for Korean equity holdings
Under Article 147 of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act (FSCMA), an investor who acquires 5 percent or more …
Liability for a Culpa in Contrahendo in Korean law in light of the Hyundai Group Case
In 2010, Hyundai Group, backed by Hyundai Merchant Marine, was named the preferred bidder for the 34.88 percent stake in Hyundai Engineering & Construction (Hyundai E&C)…
Working with ‘Inter Partes Review’
On September 16th, 2012, the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) initiated a new procedure called Inter Partes Review or …
Worker’s compensation rights and ‘Ordinary Wages’
Under Article 6 of the Enforcement Decree of the Labor Standard Act (the Labor Act), ‘Ordinary Wages’ is defined as …
Franchising in Korea: areas for consideration
Over the past decade the number of franchises launched by domestic and foreign companies in Korea has increased significantly …
Related Articles
IHC Magazine: Dec 2024 issue with Counsel of the Year Awards 2024 and focus on Dispute Resolution
In this issue, we celebrate the IHC Counsel of the Year Awards, featuring insights from winning teams, delve into the future of dispute resolution with insights from in-house counsel, and sit down with Ben Bury, General Counsel of Gammon Construction, ...
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
In Korea, a licensee is now considered an interested party who may invalidate a patent
On February 21, 2019, the Korea Supreme Court issued a decision making it clear that a licensee is an interested party who may file a petition to invalidate a patent for which he holds a licence ...
Latest Articles
IHC Magazine: Dec 2024 issue with Counsel of the Year Awards 2024 and focus on Dispute Resolution
In this issue, we celebrate the IHC Counsel of the Year Awards, featuring insights from winning teams, delve into the future of dispute resolution with insights from in-house counsel, and sit down with Ben Bury, General Counsel of Gammon Construction, ...
Nicholas H. Park
