Indonesia

Screen Shot 2017-11-17 at 1.08.08 pm

By Chandra Karina and Bagus Aditya, Lubis Ganie Sur owidjojo

E: chandra@lgslaw.co.id,

E: bagus@lgslaw.co.id

 

The electricity industry is known to be a complicated but important industry, where external factors that are beyond the control of the parties involved can cause problems to the progress and/or cost of the projects. Some risks can be tackled through the proper application of risk management if they are known ahead. However, the same cannot be said for unforeseeable risks. The risk of government force majeure is one of these risks that can pose significant threats and uncertainties to a project.

The electricity business in Indonesia is unique, as the only two parties to the power purchase agreement (PPA) are usually a private sector developer, and a state-owned utility company (PLN). The basic principle of proper risk allocation is that risk should be assigned to the party best positioned to mitigate its impact. Naturally, in Indonesian PPA models, the state-owned entity shall take responsibility for actions and/or inactions of the state.

This means that PLN should fully accept the financial impact to developers for such events in the form of tariff adjustments or, in the case of prolonged delays of the project due to government force majeure (usually exceeding 180 days), PLN must purchase the project for an amount agreed in the PPA if the developer chooses to terminate the PPA. This has been the practice in Indonesia’s PPA models for years.

When the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources issued Regulation No. 10 of 2017 on Main Provisions for Power Purchase Agreements (MEMR Regulation 10/2017) on January 23, 2017, there were strong reactions in the market. This regulation provides that both PLN and the developers will together take responsibility for government force majeure events, which are defined as changes in policies or regulations. This shifts the risk traditionally borne by PLN to the developer. The Article 28 paragraph 7 of MEMR Regulation 10/2017 implies that where the project is terminated due to a government force majeure, then PLN has no obligation to buy out the project.

MEMR Regulation No. 10/2017 spScreen Shot 2017-10-12 at 11.28.52 amarked more controversy because it affected risk allocation under the government guarantee for eligible independent power producer (IPP) projects in the form of business viability guarantee letters issued based on Minister of Finance Regulation No. 130/PMK.08/2016 of 2016 on The Procedures of The Issuance of Government Guarantee for the Acceleration of Electricity Infrastructure Provision (MoF Regulation 130/2016). Based on this regulation the government would guarantee PLN’s financial obligations, including its obligations arising from political risk. Political risk in the MoF Regulation 130/2016 is defined as unjustified government action or inaction and/or change in law. In other words, government force majeure as a project risk could be covered under the government guarantee. However, by the issuance of MEMR Regulation 10/2017 it became uncertain whether the government could still guarantee such risks for new projects for which PPAs had not yet been signed. In addition, it was crucial for the market to know whether the coverage of political/government force majeure under government guarantees that had been issued for several IPP projects in the past were still valid.

Complaints from private sector developers resulted in the issuance of MEMR Regulation No. 49 of 2017 on the Amendment of Regulation 10/2017 on August 8, 2017 (MEMR Regulation 49/2017). There is significant change from MEMR Regulation 10/2017 to MEMR Regulation 49/2017. This amendment removed the risk of government force majeure from the list of risks that must be covered together by the developer and PLN. It means parties to the PPA are free to negotiate and can agree on risk allocation, particularly on government force majeure, as previously practised in other PPA models in Indonesia. It also means the political risk as mentioned in MoF Regulation 130/2016 can still be covered under the government guarantee.

Although, the issues within MEMR Regulation 10/2017 are not only concerning government force majeure risk being shifted to the developers, addressing this issue was indeed a completion of one major task in order to reassure developers and lenders that the new generation of PPAs in Indonesia still provide a model in which they are willing to invest.

 

LGS_The Law on Your Side2017

 

 

W: www.lgslaw.co.id

E: chandra@lgslaw.co.id, bagus@lgslaw.co.id

T: (62-21) 831-5005, 831-5025

F: (62-21) 831-5015, 831-5018

 

Tags: Energy, Indonesia, Natural Resources
Related Articles by Firm
Indonesia: Technical provisions for the implementation of anti-money laundering and prevention of terrorism financing programmes within capital market sector
Indonesia’s Financial Services Authority (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan/ OJK) has issued Circular Letter No. 47/SEOJK.04/2017 ...
Indonesia: New regulation on guidelines and procedures for the implementation of investment climate development activities
The head of the Indonesian Investment Coordinating Board issued Regulation No. 9 of 2017 on Guidelines and Procedures for the Implementation of Investment Climate Development Activities ...
Indonesia: Amendment to government regulation on oil and gas cost recovery
On June 15, 2017, Indonesian Government issued Government Regulation No. 27 of 2017, amending Government Regulation No. 79 of 2010 on the Recoverable Operational Costs ...
Indonesia: New draft bill on the restriction of hard-cash transactions
The Indonesian government and the House of Representatives are currently in the process of drafting the Draft Bill on the Restriction of Hard-Cash Transactions ...
New regulation on wage structure and scale for businesses
A new regulation enacted by Indonesia’s Minister of Manpower requires employers to formulate, set and inform their employees of wage structure and scale....
Key new provisions for power purchase agreements
On January 23, 2017, Indonesia’s Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources introduced a regulation that limits room for negotiation and risk allocation in power purchase agreements (PPAs)....
Recent changes to Indonesia’s coal and mineral resources regulations
On January 11, 2017, the Government of Indonesia enacted Government Regulation No. 1 of 2017 on Fourth Amendment of Government Regulation No. 23 of 2010 on Implementation of Mineral and Coal Mining Business Activity ...
Indonesia’s new construction bill
In December 2016, Indonesia’s Parliament passed the Construction Services Bill to replace existing legislation on construction services, Law No. 18 of 1999 on Construction Services ...
Reformulation of coal prices for mine-mouth power plants
The Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources (MoEMR) has amended a number of key provisions that regulate the price for coal used in mine-mouth power plants. ...
Related Articles
IHC Magazine: Dec 2024 issue with Counsel of the Year Awards 2024 and focus on Dispute Resolution
In this issue, we celebrate the IHC Counsel of the Year Awards, featuring insights from winning teams, delve into the future of dispute resolution with insights from in-house counsel, and sit down with Ben Bury, General Counsel of Gammon Construction, ...
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
Update: Guide to Background Checks in Indonesia
Background checks on employees are not expressly regulated by Indonesian employment laws but certain background checks are subject to the applicant or employee's consent.
New Manpower Regulation Eliminates Controversial Work Permit Requirements in Indonesia
Indonesia eases requirements for work permits of expatriates working in the country.
Recent changes to Indonesia’s coal and mineral resources regulations
On January 11, 2017, the Government of Indonesia enacted Government Regulation No. 1 of 2017 on Fourth Amendment of Government Regulation No. 23 of 2010 on Implementation of Mineral and Coal Mining Business Activity ...
Latest Articles
IHC Magazine: Dec 2024 issue with Counsel of the Year Awards 2024 and focus on Dispute Resolution
In this issue, we celebrate the IHC Counsel of the Year Awards, featuring insights from winning teams, delve into the future of dispute resolution with insights from in-house counsel, and sit down with Ben Bury, General Counsel of Gammon Construction, ...