India

The Controller of Patents (India) recently revoked the patent granted for the anti-retroviral drug ‘Valganciclovir’ used for treating active cytomegalovirus retinitis infection (CMV) which, if untreated, leads to blindness in people with HIV. The said patent was granted by the patent office vide Indian Patent No. 207232 to Hoffman-La-Roche for Valganciclovir against the mail-box Application No. 959/MAS/1995 filed on July 27, 1995 under Section 5(2) of the Patents Act, 1970 [hereinafter referred to as the ‘1970 Act’].

The patent was revoked by the controller vide the above mentioned order primarily on the following grounds:

  • The Valganciclovir patent was anticipated by the prior art US’924 and EP’329. The EP’329 has a Markush type claim and had planted a sign post at the precise destination well before the inventors of the Valganciclovir patent. A skilled person working in the synthetic chemistry field could easily arrive at the present invention without further experimentation;
  • Section 3(d) of the 1970 Act had not been satisfied as the improvement in oral bioavailability of the new form L-monovaline ester of ganciclovir than bis-valine ester of ganciclovir was not supported in the specification pertaining to efficacy;
  • The controller also observed that expert evidence can be used for understanding the prior art documents, but it should not be relied upon as a prior art, due to the fact that expert evidence, unlike research documents, is not impartial.
  • The controller also held that NGOs may be deemed ‘persons interested’ and thus have the locus standi to file post-grant opposition as they are the end users or persons are directly and severely affected, if the patent is granted.

    The Valganciclovir patent has been entangled in several controversies, judicial and quasi-judicial (if the pre-grant and post-grant oppositions may be described so), proceedings for almost half a decade now. The Valganciclovir patent had been initially granted without hearing pre-grant opposition filed by Indian Network for Positive People (INP+) and Tamil Nadu Network of Positive People (TNNP+). At this stage, INP+ and TNNP+ had moved the Madras High Court which set aside the grant of patent directing the assistant controller to hear the pre-grant oppositions before concluding in grant or rejection of the patent. The assistant controller after hearing the oppositions proceeded to grant the patent
    in 2009.

    Subsequently, INP and TNNP also moved the Apex Court which allowed these organisations to participate in the post-grant opposition proceedings through intervention cum affidavit alongside the already-on-record post-grant opponents, namely Delhi Network of Positive People (DNP+), CIPLA, Matrix, Ranbaxy and Bakul Pharma. The controller, after having considered the post-grant oppositions, revoked the patent whereafter Hoffman-La Roche approached the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) in appeal. The IPAB on certain technical grounds set aside the revocation and remanded the matter back to the controller for looking into the revocation afresh. The controller thereafter reconsidered the post-grant oppositions and ultimately revoked the Valganciclovir patent vide the order dated July 1, 2015, primarily on the grounds stated above.

    The grant of the said patent was particularly significant as the application claimed its earliest priority dated July 28, 1994, therefore making Valganciclovir the first prior-to-1995 pharmaceutical product to be patented in India while the general assumption has been that only drug molecules post 1995 are eligible for patent protection in India since India became a party to TRIPS in 1995.

    Having said that, the revocation of the Valganciclovir patent is a landmark decision and a significant relief for patients as it has now opened the gates for cheaper generic versions of the same, thus making the treatment more affordable. The instant decision is also noteworthy in light of the fact that it was for the first time in this matter that the scope of ‘persons interested’ under Section 2(1) of the 1970 Act who can file post grant oppositions was expanded to include NGOs by the Indian Patent Office when it first revoked the patent in 2010. The above mentioned widening of the definition of ‘persons interested’ has also been discussed briefly and reaffirmed by the Controller of Patents, Chennai in the latest Order dated
    July 1, 2015.

    Clasis Law
    14th Floor, Dr Gopal Das Bhawan,
    28, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi 110 001, India
    Tel: (91) 11 4213 0000 / Fax: (91) 11 4213 0099
    Email: rahul.beruar@clasislaw.com
    sarita.rout@clasislaw.com
    www.clasislaw.com

    Related Articles by Firm
    Radical changes in the Foreign Direct Investment regime
    INDIA- It is observed that India has the potential to attract even more foreign investment which could be achieved by liberalising ...
    Mare Maritime Singapore Pte Ltd Vs. M.T. Everrich 8 [Notice of Motion (L) No. 2418 of 2015 in Admiralty Suit No. 854 of 2015]
    Background: The owners of EVERRICH 8 (the Vessel), through their subsidiary Yuanland Ltd, entered into voyage charterparty with Rakha Al Khaleej International LLC ...
    India's The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2015 makes major changes to the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996
    The Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance 2015 gives the necessary impetus for ease of conducting arbitration in India and enables speedy settlement of commercial disputes.
    Multiple lenders = multiple stamping
    On August 11, 2015 the division bench of the Supreme Court of India overturned a full bench decision of the Gujarat High Court in the matter of Coastal Gujarat Power Limited v. Chief Controlling Revenue Authority....
    Urban reforms – three urban rejuvenation schemes launched
    There is a compelling need to develop sustainable and technology-driven urban centres, partly as the burgeoning urban population is creating pressure on existing cities and partly to address the growing ...
    Highlights of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015
    The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015 (Amendment Act), which aims to amend the rigidities of the Companies Act, 2013 (Act), has ...
    India - Projects, energy and infrastructure update
    Including: Long-term infrastructure bonds;Smart cities mission and urban rejuvenation scheme; Railways to e-auction re-development of stations; New hybrid annuity model of PPP for the road sector; Shell set for global acquisition of BG; and IFC signs master co-operation agreement ...
    The New Land Bill – ground reality
    The Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (Amendment) Bill, 2015 (2015 Bill) was …
    Prima Facie Validity of a registered trade mark in India – A strong but rebuttable presumption
    The Indian trademarks law recognises both statutory as well as common law remedy to protect the rights of the proprietor of a trade mark. However, it is well-known that …
    Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill passed as ordinance in India
    The long-awaited Insurance Laws (Amendment) Bill (the Bill) has become a provisional law in India. The Bill, which could not be passed in Parliament in its winter session, was promulgated by the President …
    Need for uniform stamp duty incidence across all States of India
    ‘Stamp Duty’ is a tax levied on an instrument by which any right or liability is, or purports to be created, transferred, limited, extended, extinguished or recorded …
    ‘Make in India’ campaign: Opportunities for investors
    With a vision of leading the economy towards a path of high sustainable growth, the Prime Minister of India on September 25th, 2014 launched the ‘Make in India’ campaign. Through the …
    Bumpy road ahead for vehicle manufacturers in India – pulled up by the competition watchdog
    South Asian markets are one of the fastest growing markets for vehicle manufacturers worldwide. However, doing business in South Asia has its own challenges. The anti-monopoly watchdog of India …
    Introduction of real estate investment trusts in India
    The Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) in India have been in the news for some time. The World Bank1 describes REIT as a security sold to investors for the purpose of investing in real estate. REITs …
    SC Larger Bench decision in case of Kone Elevators – distinction between ‘contracts of sale’ vis-a-vis ‘works contract’
    The Constitutional Bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court (SC), over-ruling the earlier decision of three-member Bench re State of A.P. v. Kone Elevators (India) Ltd1, has held that the activity of manufacturing, …
    Companies Act, 2013 – implications for investors
    One of the recent initiatives of the Indian Government towards ensuring sustainable economic growth and improving investment climate is enactment …
    India Update, inc. Medical device controls
    An overview of how and where regulatory controls apply to medical devices in India. Plus: key judgements passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court; changes in corporate and commercial matters; and case laws in indirect taxation.
    Related Articles
    Related Articles by Jurisdiction
    Life Sciences Special Report
    Offering huge potential for expansion and returns, almost every active economy in Asia is making efforts to actively develop a niche in the life sciences industry. In ‘Asia’s winning formula’ Asian-Counsel discusses how countries are positioning themselves to carve ...
    India: Directors' duties and liabilities under the Companies Act, 2013
    Directors must be aware of their role, responsibilities and duties towards the company and its shareholders ...
    Latest Articles