Malaysia

In October 2014, the Federal Court of Malaysia, in Harianto Effendy Zakaria & Ors v Mahkamah Perusahaan Malaysia & Anor, [2014] 6 MLJ 305, upheld the dismissal of nine former bank employees by Bumiputera Commerce Bank Berhad (now known as Commerce International Merchant Bank, or CIMB, (the Bank), for unlawful picketing at the premises of the Bank.

The Facts
The appellants, who were members of the National Union of Bank Employees (NUBE), were employees of the second respondent, the Bank. As active members of NUBE, they were found to have participated in a trade union picketing in relation to a trade dispute between NUBE and the second respondent. It was alleged that bullhorns, air horns, whistles, banners and placards were used during the picket.

The Bank alleged that the picketing was unlawful as it was conducted within the premises, and that the appellants’ conduct had disrupted their business and operations. Upon a thorough investigation and subsequent domestic inquiry, the appellants were found guilty of misconduct, and their services were thereafter terminated.

Industrial Court
The Industrial Court, the first respondent in this case, upheld the decision of the Bank to terminate the appellants’ services, and held that although the misconduct was minor, the punishment of dismissal was necessary as such misconduct affected the second respondent’s goodwill in the banking industry.

The High Court
The appellants filed an application to the High Court for judicial review to quash the award, and contended that the Industrial Court had failed to consider relevant matters, and as a result, arrived at a totally perverse decision. The High Court ruled in favour of the Industrial Court and concluded that no error of law was committed in respect of the findings of facts relating to the appellants’ misconduct.

The Court of Appeal
An appeal was then filed to the Court of Appeal on the basis that the dismissal was too harsh and actuated by discriminative practice. The Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed the appellants’ appeal and ruled that since there was grave misconduct involving the core of the second respondent’s existence, dismissal would have been the inevitable punishment.

The Federal Court
The issues before the Federal Court were, namely: whether the appellants’ misconduct constituted just cause or excuse for dismissal; whether the punishment of dismissal was too harsh; and whether a high standard of conduct is expected from employees in the banking industry.

The Decision

The Federal Court dismissed the appellants’ appeal and held that there was no fixed rule of law to suggest that employees with unblemished records of service should not be dismissed for a single instance of insolence. It is important to consider the nature of the misconduct, whether they showed any remorse, and the nature of the employer’s business. As the appellants’ misconduct was clearly an act of wilful disobedience to which they showed no remorse, the dismissal was justified. Furthermore, the banking industry belonged to a special kind of business which renders services to the public, and therefore a high standard of conduct was expected of its employees.

ZUL RAFIQUE & partners
D3-3-8 Solaris Dutamas, No 1 Jalan Dutamas 1
50480 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Tel: (60) 3 6209 8228
Fax: (60) 3 6209 8221
Email: mariette.peters@zulrafique.com.my
amylia.soraya@zulrafique.com.my
Website: www.zulrafique.com.my
Related Articles by Firm
Moral Rights … From peaks to pieces
MALAYSIA- Six years ago, the cultural and historical sculpture, Lunar Peaks or Puncak Purnama (‘the Sculpture’) made the national headlines when ...
Introducing the tort of sexual harassment
The Malaysian Federal Court in the case of Mohd Ridzwan bin Abdul Razak v Asmah binti Hj Mohd Nor recently delivered a landmark judgment ...
New Minimum Wages from July 2016
In Malaysia, the National Minimum Wages initiative (the Policy) was first introduced and announced by the Malaysian Prime Minister ...
Only Muslims may practise in Syariah courts
The Malaysian Federal Court in the case of Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan v Victoria Jayaseele Martin [2016] 1 LNS 131
Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement ... some highlights
The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (the TPPA) is a multilateral free trade agreement which aims to further liberalise the economies of ...
Financial Ombudsman Scheme
Financial Ombudsman Schemes are not novel in countries such as Australia, Ireland, the United Kingdom, and Singapore. On October 29, 2015, the Central Bank of Malaysia...
Budget 2016... Some highlights
Budget 2016 was first unveiled on October 23, 2015 by the Malaysian Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, Dato’ Sri Mohd ...
The Prevention of Terrorism Act 2015
The Prevention of Terrorism Act 2015 (the Act) came into force on September 1, 2015. The Act, which aims to prevent the conduct or ...
A new strata regime
Introduction The Strata Management Act 2013 (the Act) which came into force on June 1, 2015 repeals the Building and Common Property (Maintenance and Management) Act 2007. The implementation of the ...
Unfair dismissal…compensation, reinstatement, or neither?
The Malaysian Federal Court in the case of Unilever (M) Holdings Sdn Bhd v So Lai & Anor1 has issued a landmark ruling whereby it was held that an employee who had been wrongfully ...
The net effect
Netting arrangements refer to the settlement of obligations between two parties that processes the combined value of transactions. It is designed to lower the number of transactions ...
Taxing times ahead?
The Goods and Services Tax (GST) at the rate of 6 percent was introduced in Malaysia with effect from April 1, 2015. ...
What to expect when you are expecting…
The Court of Appeal, in the recent decision of Airasia Bhd v Rafizah Shima Mohamed Aris,1 ruled on the extent of which …
Amendments to the Malaysian Penal Code
After the withdrawal of two controversial clauses relating to the national flag and vandalism, the amendments made to the Malaysian Penal Code finally took effect …
Prompt, punctual and paid (the Construction Industry Payment & Adjudication Act)
The construction industry, which has always been one of the more productive sectors, is constantly contributing to Malaysia’s economy. However, its fluctuating growth rates …
The Malaysian Credit Reporting Agencies Act comes into force
The Credit Reporting Agencies Act (CRA Act) came into force on January 15th, 2014. The Act provides for the registration and regulation of credit reporting agencies that are carrying on credit …
Landmark case on minimum wages in Malaysia… Does it include a service charge?
In June 2014, the Malaysian Industrial Court, in a landmark decision, ruled on the issue of a hotel employee’s salary structure. …
Deep impact... (on Malaysia’s bond market?)
The recent decision of the Malaysian Federal Court reported as CIMB Bank Bhd v Maybank Trustees Bhd & Other Appeals [2014] 3 CLJ 1 appeared to have changed the landscape of the bond market …
The liberalisation of legal services in Malaysia
After several years of dialogue, debate and deliberation, the amendments to the Malaysian Legal Profession Act 1976 have finally come into force, taking effect from June 3rd, 2014. The Legal Profession Act …
Related Articles
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
Revised guidelines on the establishment and operations of Labuan leasing business
A key change requires Labuan leasing companies to establish substantial activities and perform strategic functions in Labuan.
Plugging the loopholes
Partner Ronald H.L. Tan of Tay & Partners reveals the reasons why Malaysian authorities are intending to make changes to the jurisdiction’s Take-Over Code.
Restructuring & Insolvency Special Report
In this month’s cover feature, we take a look at the reasons why in-house counsel need to stay alert to restructuring and insolvency trends, and talk to experts from around the region about the practical considerations which should be ...
Latest Articles