Malaysia

Trade_&_Claim_Carbon_Credits (1)

Introduction

Undeniably, there has been an increase on the level of awareness on how greenhouse gases (“GHG”) emission has significantly affect the world every year. For companies, CSR campaigns were undertaken where pledges were made to help reduce and potentially prevent climate change by taking the initiative to reduce their GHG emission and setting the goal to achieve net zero carbon emission by 2050. Companies such as Petronas declared their Aspiration to achieve net zero carbon emission by 2050.1 One of the potential ways to achieve this net zero emission goal is through the carbon credit market. Carbon credit also gained the attention in ESG investing which contributes to the reduction of carbon.2 This article will focus on explaining how carbon credits work and how it will help to achieve the net zero emission goal. Most importantly, this article will explain how carbon credits can be claimed and traded followed by a further discussion on the initiative taken by Malaysia in promoting the carbon credit market.

What are Carbon Credits

Carbon credits are certificates or permits that allow the owner to emit a certain amount of carbon dioxide or other GHG3 over a certain period time4. 1 credit permits the emission of 1-ton of carbon dioxide or its equivalent in other GHG.5 Carbon credits are tradeable and only exist in jurisdictions that are governed by a “Cap-and-Trade” system.6 Countries or regions that have already implemented the cap-and-trade system includes the European Union (“EU”), Australia, New Zealand, South Korea,

California and Quebec.7 The purpose of carbon credits is to overall lower the amount of GHG released by the buyers. This allows companies and individuals to account for their unavoidable emissions by buying carbon credits.8 This concept also incentivize climate action by enabling parties to trade carbon credits generated by the reduction or removal of GHG from the atmosphere, such as by switching from fossil fuels to renewable energy or by enhancing or conserving carbon stocks in ecosystems such as a forest.9

Carbon trading started as early as 1997 when countries signed the Kyoto Protocol.10 The Kyoto Protocol operationalised the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and was adopted on 11 December 1997.11It commits industrialised countries to limit and/or reduces GHG emissions according to the agreed individual targets.12 This protocol binds 37 industrialised countries and economies in transition as well as the EU.13 To date, there are 192 parties to the Kyoto Protocol including Malaysia14 which signed the Kyoto Protocol on 12 March 1999 and ratified the same on 4 September 2002. Trading of carbon credit is made available under Article 17 of the Kyoto Protocol as it allows countries to sell spare carbon credits to countries that exceeded their targets.

In addition to the above, the Kyoto Protocol became more effective with the coming into force of the Paris Agreement on 4 November 2016, which is a legally binding international treaty on climate change where its goal is to limit global warming to below

2 or ideally, to 1.5 degrees Celsius.15 Article 6 of the Paris Agreement encourages voluntary cooperation between countries to help achieve emissions reduction targets16 and enables countries to trade carbon credits to help other countries to achieve its climate targets.17

How to Claim and Trade Carbon Credits

Carbon credits are a type of permit which allows the company to produce only up to a certain amount of GHG, for example, 1 carbon credit is worth the emission of 1-ton carbon dioxide or its equivalent GHG.18 The amount of carbon credits needed depends on how much GHG are emitted by the company. As a result, companies would take the initiatives to reduce the emission of GHG so that fewer carbon credits are required. Like an allowance, if the company does not use up the carbon credits, they can sell it to other companies. Alternatively, if a company needs more carbon credits, they can purchase it from others that have extra credits. Doing so is known as carbon offset where the credits are purchased to offset the company’s carbon footprint.19The above is possible via the carbon market where companies can buy and sell carbon credits20.

As Kyoto Protocol allows countries to sell spare carbon credits to countries that exceeded their targets21, carbon credit can be traded in many regional exchanges, for example, Xpansive CBL, AirCarbon Exchange and the Shanghai Environment and Energy Exchange.22 Many countries have implemented the trading system such as the EU, Canada, China, Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, Switzerland, and the United States.23

Effectiveness of carbon credit

Even though the main objective of carbon credit is to encourage the reduction of GHG emission and to achieve a net zero emission by 2050, there are some setbacks. Research showed that a much higher price of carbon credits is required in order to achieve the net zero emission target.24 Currently, the average price of carbon credits is below US$40 to US$80 per metric ton of GHG.25 Report shows that at least US$100 per tonne is necessary in order to achieve the net zero emission by 2050.26 As much as a country wishes to achieve its net zero emission target, a relatively high carbon credit price may potentially drive away some companies from purchasing carbon credits, and this will slow down the process in reaching its 2050 target. If a country wishes to achieve its net zero emission target, more stringent regulation is required.

INHOUSE

Carbon Credits in Malaysia

Malaysia too is playing its role in reducing and preventing climate change by progressing rapidly to achieve the nation’s net zero emission by 2050 as compared to the other Asean countries.27 For example, Tenaga Nasional Berhad Malaysia aims to cut down carbon emission by 30% in 2024, 45% by 2030 and achieve net zero emission by 2050.28 Malaysia has also recently committed to cut GHG intensity against GDP by 45% by 2030 as compared to 2005 levels.29 Another major step in achieving the net zero emission target is the launching of a voluntary carbon market (“VCM”), an initiative under the purview of the Ministry of Finance (MoF) and Ministry of Environment and Water (KASA), in which Bursa

Malaysia Berhad (“Bursa”) has been mandated to implement a VCM Exchange by end of 2022.30  In the VCM exchange, companies can purchase voluntary carbon credits from climate friendly projects and solutions31 to compensate for the emissions and at the same time to finance any carbon mitigation projects.32 The trading of carbon credits in the VCM exchange is similar to those in other jurisdictions in the sense that carbon credits are issued and the owner of the carbon credits can proceed to sell it to others or companies can purchase more from other carbon credits owners.

By the end of 2022, to kick start the process, carbon credits will be sold in auction to interested buyers which would assist in the price discovery for new carbon credit products that will be listed on the VCM exchange.33 Bursa plans to offer standard carbon credit products for trading on a rules-based VCM exchange with product categories for carbon credits originating from nature-based solutions and technologies that reduce and/or remove carbon emissions.34 Bursa further explained that when a developer sets up a project, they can obtain validation and register on a certification standard and a third party will verify the results. Tradeable carbon credits will be issued with a unique serial number on the registry for each ton of GHG produced from the project. The ownership of the credits belongs to the project and the ownership on the registry changes according to the next buyer, if any.

Conclusion

Ideally, the concept carbon credits are effective to reduce GHG if it is done right. As mentioned above, there are setbacks due to the low pricing of carbon credits which may hinder the net zero emission target by 2050 and at the same time there are pros and cons to propose for higher pricing for carbon credits. Ultimately, the government plays an important role not only in regulating and enforcing the carbon trading but also educating and raising awareness on the same. A more stringent enforcement in the purchase of carbon credits pushes the country to achieve its climate targets. Like ESG, Malaysia is fairly new to carbon trading and the VCM is a positive step in introducing carbon trading to companies in Malaysia and it guarantees some, if not a huge impact, in the reduction of GHG emission. At the time of writing, since the VCM has yet to be launched, it is too early to determine its effectiveness as it depends on how the Malaysian Government and Bursa manage the carbon credits, its pricing and trading. Eventually, for a better progress in achieving the net zero target, Malaysia can slowly shift from a voluntary carbon trading to a regulated carbon trading, ensuring companies purchase of the carbon credits and further encouraging the reduction of GHG emission.

Authors:

INAMUL HASSAN SHAHINAMUL HASSAN SHAH graduated from International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) with LL.B First Class (Hon) in 2015. He has been involved in various M&A and venture capital related assignments predominantly on equity investments by Government Linked Companies such as MTDC, PERNAS and SME Bank. He has also advised on corporate governance and legislative amendments. He is now managing the Private Equity and Venture Capital practice group.

 

 

GABRIELLE LIM WAI YEEGABRIELLE LIM WAI YEE
Legal Executive
Gabrielle pursued her law degree and graduated from the University of Leeds, United Kingdom in 2020. She completed the Bar Training Course and was admitted to the Bar of England and Wales in 2021. She also completed her masters, LL.M in Legal Practice (Bar) from BPP University, Bristol, UK in 2022. She commenced her pupillage with Messrs Azmi & Associates in April 2022. She is currently attached to the Shipping, Litigation & Arbitration Practice Group.

 


 

Tags: Carbon Credits, carbon emissions, GHG, Green House, Kyoto Protocol
Related Articles by Firm
Revised guidelines on the establishment and operations of Labuan leasing business
A key change requires Labuan leasing companies to establish substantial activities and perform strategic functions in Labuan.
Structuring a joint venture arrangement based on musharakah mutanaqisah
Parties that wish to form a joint venture in accordance with the principles of Shariah may consider forming such a venture based on the musharakah mutanaqisah concept.
Process and issues in dual listing or cross listing of Malaysian-incorporated listed companies
Dual listing is when a company’s shares are listed on two or more different exchanges in addition to its domestic exchange for the purpose of adding liquidity to the shares and allowing investors greater choice in where they can ...
Net energy metering guidelines in Malaysia
The government of Malaysia has introduced various incentives and strategies to encourage the growth of the renewable energy (RE) segment in Malaysia ...
Sustainability reporting for PLCs in Malaysia
Back in 2015, Bursa Malaysia, the Malaysian stock exchange, reported that the Global Risks 2015 report by the World Economic Forum identified that 70 percent of the top 10 risks were sustainability-related, which in turn “raises new risks and opportunities for businesses to understand” ...
Malaysia introduces audit exemption for certain private companies
The growth of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) has played a significant role in the process of industrialisation worldwide ...
MALAYSIA: Managing risks along China’s belt and road initiative
China’s belt and road initiative (BRI) involves Chinese companies investing in or with companies in the belt-and-road countries ...
Malaysia: Maintaining a compliance programme
A compliance programme is, simply put, a set of guidelines and procedures developed internally within an organisation to ensure that it abides by the laws and regulations ...
Fintech in Malaysia: Trends and recent legal developments
Financial services institutions in Malaysia have made aggressive efforts to embrace and keep pace with fintech ...
Related Articles
Related Articles by Jurisdiction
Plugging the loopholes
Partner Ronald H.L. Tan of Tay & Partners reveals the reasons why Malaysian authorities are intending to make changes to the jurisdiction’s Take-Over Code.
Unfair dismissal…compensation, reinstatement, or neither?
The Malaysian Federal Court in the case of Unilever (M) Holdings Sdn Bhd v So Lai & Anor1 has issued a landmark ruling whereby it was held that an employee who had been wrongfully ...
Latest Articles